If you really want a Remy profile action that is done "right", I think it's better to start out with a high quality custom Remy profile action, available from several makers, that actually is high-quality out-of-the-box. One might argue that if the Remy receiver is such a "quality" piece as it comes from the factory, why does it need to be fixed by an army of custom gun builders who are more than happy to fix them for you for a price? Having said that, I realize that the 700 receivers are sought after by custom gun builders and bench rest shooter so they obviously are high quality. I know this may be shocking to some folks but I've never owned a 700 rifle. Not that it is defective, but during assembly glue may have gotten into the internals and cause problems. There is currently a recall on guns with the new trigger. I've not fooled around much with the guns with the new trigger, but understand it isn't very good and needs replacing too. Personally, I like the pre-82 guns, with an aftermarket trigger. The flawed trigger design was replaced in October 2006. When the safety is moved to the fire position, the gun fires. The safety is then the only thing holding back the firing pin. The trigger connector will in extremely rare cases disengage the sear as the gun is being handled. Most incidents happened when owners moved the safety to unload the rifles. This greatly reduced the number of incidents, but did not address the true problem. Post 82 guns allow you to unload the chamber with the safety still in the safe position. But after a flurry of lawsuits in the 1970's because of guns firing with no trigger pull Remington redesigned the safety and made the trigger pulls much heavier. The pre-82 rifles also had the best out of the box trigger. To unload the chamber you have to move the safety to the fire position in order to open the bolt. On pre 1982 rifles the bolt locked down when on safe. Takes about 5 seconds longer than a gun with a floor plate. I've never felt any handicap unloading a blind mag gun. A simpler design which is lighter, less expensive and theoretically more accurate since there is no cutout in the stock. Personally I'd just as soon have the ADL. The only difference is the ADL has a blind magazine where all the rest have either a floor plate, or in some cases detachable magazines.
0 kommentar(er)
